JetBrains AI vs GitHub Copilot: Which Plugin Do You Install in IntelliJ?

Same $10, same editor, ten credits against fifteen hundred. Five days to find out which number you actually feel.

GH

GitHub Copilot

by GitHub · Pro $10/mo, 1,500 AI credits

Winner
VS
JB

JetBrains AI

by JetBrains · AI Pro $10/mo, 10 credits, Junie included

Advertisement

Quick Summary

Ten AI credits lasted four working days. That is the shortest honest summary of JetBrains AI Pro at $10 a month, and its pricing page does not say so. JetBrains meters 10 credits per 30 days, one credit to the dollar. Copilot sells Pro at the same $10 with 1,500 credits at a cent each: $15 of headroom, plus completions that never touch the meter.

The refactoring went the other way. JetBrains AI turned a sealed class hierarchy into a sealed interface across 31 files by calling IntelliJ’s own refactoring engine, and the first build compiled. Copilot rewrote the same hierarchy as text in 27 files, missed four non-exhaustive when branches, and left four compile errors for us. JetBrains also named a transactional bug in 100 seconds, because the inspection that finds it ships with the IDE.

Completions belong to Copilot: 33 of 40 stubs accepted untouched at a 190 ms median, against 28 of 40 at 1.2 seconds. That gap repeats every few minutes of a working day.

Bottom line: Copilot wins the purchase decision at $10. Better completions, a third of the metered spend on identical work, and it keeps working when you open the repo in VS Code. JetBrains AI wins two jobs clearly: multi-file refactors on Kotlin and Java, where it drives the IDE’s engine instead of guessing at text, and code that cannot leave the machine, where local models cost zero credits.
📷 Hands-On Test

We Actually Ran This Prompt

October 19 to 23, 2026, in IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate 2026.1, both plugins in one checkout of a 9,400-line Kotlin 2.1 and Spring Boot 3.5 payments service: Gradle 8.14, JUnit 5 with Testcontainers, 268 tests green at the start. JetBrains AI ran on AI Pro at $10, Copilot on Pro at $10. Three rules held all week: same clean checkout per task, a completion counted only if accepted with Tab and never edited, and the task ended at handoff, so we fixed nothing the tool admitted it could not finish. Copilot’s inline completion stayed off during the JetBrains runs, since both bind Tab.

📜 The exact prompt we used
The five tasks, verbatim. 1. Completions: 40 KDoc-only stubs across 7 files, accepted with Tab. 2. Refactor: “Turn PaymentResult from a sealed class into a sealed interface with data class implementations. Update every when so it stays exhaustive. Keep serialization identical and the suite green.” 3. Diagnose: “Ledger rows survive when a refund fails. Tell me why before you change anything.” 4. VS Code: open the same checkout and say whether the tool exists there. 5. Meter: read both dashboards nightly and log credits per run.
GitHub Copilot Winner
Recorded in IntelliJ IDEA, October 21, 2026: Copilot’s refactor diff with four when branches still on the old subtype, and the compiler listing them.
Copilot won the task we do most: 33 of 40 stubs correct, kept with Tab at a 190 ms median. The seven misses were JPA derived query names that invented property paths. The refactor failed structurally, because Copilot edits files as text: at 31-file scale four non-exhaustive when branches in reporting/ and admin/ never learned about the new subtype, and the compiler found them. Two follow-ups and 52 minutes later, 268 of 268 green. The diagnosis came second, after its first answer blamed the wrong method’s propagation setting.
JetBrains AI
Recorded in IntelliJ IDEA, October 21, 2026: Junie running Convert to sealed interface across the 31-file hierarchy, with the six approval stops it asked for.
JetBrains AI earned its keep on the refactor and nowhere else. Junie called IntelliJ’s Convert to sealed interface and Rename refactorings, so all 31 files changed through the IDE’s own paths: zero compile errors, 268 of 268 tests, 2 hours 14 minutes, six approval stops. Slower than Copilot on one file, faster on one type everywhere, because the index is the safety net instead of the compiler. The transaction bug took 100 seconds, since IntelliJ carries the inspection and JetBrains AI reads it. Completion is the weak spot at 28 of 40 and 1.2 seconds. Ten included credits ran out Thursday; eleven runs cost 13.6.
MetricGitHub CopilotJetBrains AI
Task 1: completions accepted unmodified (of 40)33 ✓28
Task 1: median latency to first suggestion190 ms ✓1.2 s
Task 2: files updated, compile errors at handoff (of 31)27 files, 4 errors31 files, 0 errors ✓
Task 2: time to 268 of 268 green3 h 06 m2 h 14 m ✓
Task 3: named the self-invocationSecond answer, 6 min 20 sFirst answer, 1 min 40 s ✓
Task 4: runs in VS Code on the same repoYes ✓No, JetBrains IDEs only
Task 5: metered spend on 11 agent runs$4.28, or $0.39 a run ✓$13.60, or $1.24 a run
Winner🏆 GitHub Copilot: completion, latency, cost per task, any editorJetBrains AI: JVM refactors, root-cause diagnosis, local models

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side breakdown across key categories

FeatureGitHub CopilotJetBrains AIWinner
Where it runsVS Code, all JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, Neovim, Xcode, CLIJetBrains IDEs, ReSharper and Android Studio. Nothing elseGitHub Copilot
How it reads your codeRepository index over file buffers. Edits land as text and the compiler checks afterThe Program Structure Interface, the index behind IntelliJ refactoring and inspectionsJetBrains AI
31-file sealed-interface refactor27 of 31 files, four non-exhaustive when branches, four compile errors, 3 h 06 m31 of 31 through IDE refactorings, zero compile errors, 2 h 14 mJetBrains AI
Metered budget at $101,500 credits at a cent each: $15 of model usage10 credits at a dollar each: $10 of model usageGitHub Copilot
AgentAgent mode in the IDE, plus a GitHub-side agent that opens pull requestsJunie and Claude Agent, plan-first. JetBrains reports 61.6% on SWE-RebenchGitHub Copilot
Local models and offline workCloud only. No BYOK, nothing runs offlineOllama, LM Studio, llama.cpp, LiteLLM at zero credits, code stays localJetBrains AI
IP indemnityIncluded on Business and EnterpriseNot offered on any tierGitHub Copilot
Advertisement

Pros and Cons

GitHub Copilot Pros

  • 33 of 40 completions accepted untouched at 190 ms, the part of the job you repeat all day
  • $0.39 per agent run against $1.24, and the same plugin in VS Code, Neovim and Xcode

GitHub Copilot Cons

  • Left four non-exhaustive when branches at 31-file scale, because it edits text and waits for the compiler
  • No bring-your-own-key and no offline mode. Every keystroke is a round trip

JetBrains AI Pros

  • 31 of 31 files refactored through the IDE’s own engine, zero compile errors, 52 minutes faster
  • Named the self-invocation behind the ledger bug in 100 seconds, because IntelliJ had the inspection

JetBrains AI Cons

  • Ten credits on the $10 plan is $10 of usage. Ours ran out on Thursday of the first week
  • JetBrains IDEs only, no IP indemnity, and 1.2 second completions next to Copilot’s 190 ms

Pricing Breakdown

TierJetBrains AIGitHub Copilot
Free$0: 3 credits per 30 days, unlimited Mellum completion, local models at zero credits. Missing from Android Studio and both Community editions$0: 2,000 completions and 50 chats a month, one Auto model, no agent mode
Individual at $10AI Pro $10/mo or $100 a year: 10 credits per 30 days, Junie and Claude Agent included, top-ups allowed. Bundled with the All Products PackPro $10/mo or $100 a year: 1,500 credits, 1,000 base plus 500 flex. Free for verified students and teachers
Individual, higherAI Ultimate $30/mo or $300 a year: 35 credits plus a 5-credit bonusPro+ $39: 7,000 credits. Max $100: 20,000
BusinessAI Pro Business $20: 20 credits. AI Ultimate Business $60: 70. AI Enterprise $60, quote-basedBusiness $19: 1,900 credits and IP indemnity. Enterprise $39: 3,900
When you run outTop up at $1 per credit, valid 12 months. Local models keep working either wayNothing runs on a drained balance until the reset, so set a spending cap first

Both meter tokens and both leave completions off the meter. JetBrains gives one credit per subscription dollar, so $10 buys $10 of usage. Copilot gives Pro 1,500 credits at a cent each, so $10 buys $15, a 50 percent edge on paper and a wider one in practice, since a Junie task reading twelve files and rerunning the suite four times cost about two credits where the same task in Copilot’s agent cost 63. For ten developers that edge compounds: Copilot Business at $19 carries 1,900 credits and IP indemnity, where AI Pro Business at $20 carries 20 and none. Our method is on the How We Evaluate page.

The Verdict

Copilot wins the purchase decision. JetBrains AI wins the afternoon you spend renaming one type across 31 files, and it wins the laptop that cannot reach the internet. Both of those are real. Only one of them happens every week.

Best Overall

GHGitHub Copilot

33 of 40 completions at 190 ms, 428 of 1,500 credits for a week of agent work, and it still opens in VS Code on Friday.

Best for JVM Refactors

JBJetBrains AI

31 of 31 files through the IDE’s own refactoring engine and zero compile errors. Nothing else here can call that engine.

Best for Code That Cannot Leave

JBJetBrains AI

Ollama and LM Studio models cost zero credits and make zero outbound calls. Copilot has no offline mode at all.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I run JetBrains AI and Copilot in the same IDE?

Yes. We did for five days in IntelliJ IDEA 2026.1 with no conflict. Turn one set of inline completions off first, since both bind Tab: Settings, Tools, GitHub Copilot, clear Enable Completions and keep the chat. Two competing ghost texts on one line record acceptances you never intended.

Why did JetBrains AI credits run out so fast?

Because 10 credits on AI Pro is $10 of model usage at API rates, not 10 tasks. Our 11 agent runs cost 13.6 credits in five days, and one Junie task reading 12 files and rerunning the suite four times runs about two credits. Top-ups cost $1 each and last 12 months.

Does JetBrains AI work outside JetBrains IDEs?

No. It runs in JetBrains IDEs, ReSharper and Android Studio only. Since JetBrains IDEs 2025.3.2 you can install ACP-compatible agents from the registry without an AI subscription, the nearest thing to another vendor’s agent inside the IDE. Copilot covers VS Code, Visual Studio, Neovim, Xcode and the terminal.

Is JetBrains AI included with the IDE license I already pay for?

Only on the bundles. AI Pro comes with the All Products Pack and dotUltimate, and a standalone IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate subscription does not include it. AI Free is also missing from Android Studio and both Community editions.

Buy the $10 that survives the month

Copilot took 33 of 40 completions at 190 ms and spent 428 of its 1,500 credits on the same week that pushed JetBrains AI into a $3.60 top-up. Install that first. Then add JetBrains AI on its free tier for the Kotlin and Java refactors, since AI Free still gives you the PSI refactoring engine, unlimited local completion, and three credits a month.

Affiliate disclosure: AI vs Tool is reader-supported. Some links above are affiliate links, meaning we may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. This never influences our testing or rankings. Read our full Affiliate Disclosure.

Explore More AI Tools

Still deciding? Check out these related comparisons and best-of guides.