GitHub Copilot vs Codeium: Which One in 2026?

The free option you installed years ago is now the Windsurf plugin, in maintenance mode. The paid option costs $10. We ran both for three days on the same repository to find out what the $10 actually replaces.

GH

GitHub Copilot

by GitHub · Pro $10/mo, 300 premium requests

Winner
VS
C

Codeium

now the Windsurf plugin · free tier, no completion cap

Advertisement

Quick Summary

GitHub Copilot is the better tool in 2026; Codeium is the better free tier, and the gap between them is narrower than the price suggests. We ran both for three days on the same 12,400-line TypeScript service with 240 Jest tests. Copilot Pro ($10 a month, 300 premium requests) won three checks of four: it completed nine files for a six-endpoint idempotency-key feature with 11 of 12 tests passing first run, it named the stale closure behind a flaky retry wrapper without a hint, and it works inside the GitHub pull request flow rather than beside it. Codeium — still the install name on millions of machines, now the Windsurf plugin after two renames — won the price column outright: unlimited Tab completions and unlimited inline edits for individuals, no card, and 24 of 30 completions accepted unmodified against Copilot’s 27 of 30.

Two facts decide this for most people. First, Codeium’s plugins are listed by Cognition as being in maintenance mode after the June 2026 rename of the Windsurf editor to Devin Desktop, so the free autocomplete still works but it is no longer where the investment goes. Second, Copilot Pro costs $10 and is free for verified students, which makes “free versus paid” a smaller decision than it used to be. If you want a free unlimited completion layer in JetBrains, Vim or Emacs, Codeium is still the right answer; if you want an agent that finishes a six-endpoint feature, pay the $10.

Bottom line: GitHub Copilot wins overall on agentic multi-file work, root-cause explanations and the GitHub workflow, at $10 a month — free for verified students. Codeium wins on cost, and it is not close: unlimited completions and inline edits at $0, across more editors than Copilot supports. Install Codeium if you only want completions; pay for Copilot when you start asking a tool to change several files at once.
📷 Hands-On Test

We Actually Ran This Prompt

October 5 to 8, 2026. Both tools worked on the same checkout of a 12,400-line TypeScript and Node API with 240 Jest tests, all passing at the start. GitHub Copilot ran as the extension in VS Code on the $10 Pro plan with agent mode enabled; Codeium ran as the free individual plugin in the same editor, signed in with no card on file. Same prompts, same order, one machine, no repository instructions file. Completion quality was measured by an acceptance rule we fixed in advance: a suggestion counted only if we accepted it with the Tab key and did not edit it afterwards. Three days of ordinary tickets were logged to see what each plan charged and when it slowed down.

📜 The exact prompt we used
The four tasks, verbatim. 1. Completion acceptance — write 30 new functions across six modules from doc comments alone, accepting with Tab and never editing the accepted text; count how many needed a manual fix. 2. Diagnose, do not patch — [the retry wrapper plus a real intermittent stack trace] “This fails roughly 1 in 50 calls and always on the second retry. Tell me why before you change anything.” 3. Six-endpoint feature — “Add idempotency keys to the six POST endpoints under /api/v2. Same key twice returns the first response rather than creating a duplicate. Add tests and get the suite passing.” 4. Three days of cost — ordinary tickets, logging premium requests used and any moment either tool asked us to slow down.
GitHub Copilot Winner
Recorded in VS Code, October 5–8, 2026 — Copilot’s nine-file diff, 11 of 12 Jest tests green first run.
Copilot won the feature task decisively. Asked for idempotency keys across six endpoints, it planned the change before editing, added a shared middleware plus a Redis-backed store, touched nine files including the OpenAPI schema and the test helpers, and finished with 11 of 12 tests passing on the first run; the twelfth failed on a mocked clock and was fixed in one follow-up. On the flaky retry it was equally direct: it read the wrapper, pointed out that the retry closure captured the first attempt’s error object instead of the current one, and explained why that produces a failure on the second attempt specifically. Completions were strong but not flawless — 27 of 30 accepted unmodified, with the three corrections all about project-specific naming rather than logic. Over three days it used 41 of 300 premium requests and never slowed down.
Codeium
Recorded in VS Code, October 5–8, 2026 — Codeium completing six files; schema and helpers left to wire.
Codeium’s free plugin did better at plain completion than its reputation suggests: 24 of 30 suggestions were accepted unmodified, its latency was indistinguishable in practice, and it keeps working in editors Copilot does not cover at all. Where it fell behind was anything agentic. On the six-endpoint feature it produced working code for six files but stopped there, leaving the schema, the migration and the test helpers for us to wire by hand, and nine of twelve tests passed first run. On the flaky retry it reached the correct diagnosis — the captured error object — but only after a follow-up question asking it to explain the timing rather than hand us the fix, which is a real difference when you are debugging something you did not write. It cost nothing: no card, no premium request counter, no ceiling on completions across the three days.
MetricGitHub CopilotCodeium
Task 1 — completions accepted unmodified (of 30)27 ✓24
Task 2 — named the stale closure without a hintYes, first answer ✓Yes, after a follow-up question
Task 2 — explanation names why the second retry failsYes ✓Corrected answer once asked
Task 3 — files changed for six endpoints9 — middleware, store, schema, tests ✓6 — handlers only
Task 3 — Jest tests passing first run11 of 12 ✓9 of 12
Task 3 — work left for us to finish by handOne failing test ✓Schema, migration and test helpers
Task 4 — cost of the three days$10/mo Pro; 41 of 300 premium requests$0 — free tier, no completion cap ✓
Task 4 — usable without a card on fileNo — Pro needs payment detailsYes ✓
Winner🏆 GitHub Copilot — agentic multi-file work, root-cause diagnosis, GitHub workflowCodeium — price, no completion cap, widest editor support

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side breakdown across key categories

FeatureGitHub CopilotCodeiumWinner
What it is in 2026GitHub’s assistant across VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Xcode and the GitHub siteThe plugin formerly known as Codeium, now shipped under the Windsurf plugin nameTie
Ownership and roadmapActively developed, agent mode and pull-request review shipping regularlyListed as maintenance mode by Cognition after the June 2026 Devin Desktop renameGitHub Copilot
Free tier2,000 completions and 50 chats a monthUnlimited Tab completions and unlimited inline edits, no cardCodeium
Paid entry tier$10/mo Pro with 300 premium requests; free for verified studentsNo paid plugin tier — agent work moved to Cognition’s Devin plansGitHub Copilot
Editor coverageBroad, centred on VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim and XcodeWidest of the two — also Vim, Emacs, Eclipse, Jupyter and moreCodeium
Multi-file agent editingAgent mode plans, edits and runs tests across the repositoryNot in the free plugin; the former Cascade agent was deprecatedGitHub Copilot
Pull request and code reviewReview comments and PR summaries inside GitHubNoneGitHub Copilot
Best whenThe work spans files and lands as a pull requestYou want free completions in an editor Copilot does not coverTie
Advertisement

Pros and Cons

GitHub Copilot Pros

  • Plan-then-edit agent: nine files changed for a six-endpoint feature with 11 of 12 tests passing first run
  • $10 a month, and free for verified students and teachers
  • Pull-request review and PR summaries inside GitHub, where the work already happens

GitHub Copilot Cons

  • No zero-cost tier that a professional can work in all day — the free tier is 2,000 completions and 50 chats
  • Editor coverage is broad but not as wide as Codeium’s; Vim, Emacs and Eclipse users get a thinner experience

Codeium Pros

  • Genuinely free: unlimited Tab completions and unlimited inline edits for individuals, no card required
  • 24 of 30 completions accepted unmodified, and no perceptible latency difference in ordinary editing
  • Works in more editors than anything else in the category — JetBrains, Vim, Neovim, Emacs, Eclipse, Jupyter, Xcode

Codeium Cons

  • The plugins are in maintenance mode, and Cascade — the agent they used to ship — has been deprecated in favour of Cognition’s Devin brand
  • No agentic multi-file editing in the free plugin: we finished the schema, migration and test helpers by hand

Pricing Breakdown

TierGitHub CopilotCodeium (Windsurf plugin)
Free2,000 completions + 50 chat messages per monthUnlimited Tab completions and unlimited inline edits, no card
Entry paid$10/mo Pro — unlimited completions plus 300 premium requestsNo paid plugin tier; free for individuals, with agent work moved to Cognition’s plans
StudentsFree Pro for verified students and teachersFree tier already covers individual use
Higher tierPro+ at $39/mo for full model accessDevin Pro at $20/mo if you want the agent lineage; legacy Windsurf subscribers keep $15

Copilot prices are the published GitHub plans as checked in October 2026. On the Codeium side the trail is worth following yourself: codeium.com now returns a redirect to windsurf.com, which redirects again to devin.ai/desktop — one product under three names in fourteen months, which is why the free plugin and the paid editor no longer share a pricing page. The plugin’s free individual tier is the part that survived every rename unchanged: unlimited completions, no credit card. Our method is documented on the How We Evaluate page.

The Verdict

This is not really a contest between two equal products any more. One of them is a maintained platform with an agent, a review bot and a $10 price; the other is a free completion layer that quietly does its job and is no longer being invested in. Both are worth installing.

Best Overall

GHGitHub Copilot

Nine files for a six-endpoint feature with 11 of 12 tests green first run, the real cause of a flaky retry, and $10 a month — free for students.

Best Free Option

CCodeium

Unlimited completions and inline edits at $0 with no card, and 24 of 30 suggestions accepted unmodified. There is no cheaper way to get real help.

Best for Non-VS-Code Editors

CCodeium

JetBrains, Vim, Neovim, Emacs, Eclipse, Jupyter — if Copilot does not officially support your editor, this is the answer, and the JetBrains plugin kept its own name through the rename.

Install both, pay for one

Copilot earned the $10 in three days: it finished the six-endpoint change and named the bug’s cause without a hint. Codeium costs nothing and matched it closely on plain completion, so it is the obvious first install. Run the idempotency task above in your own repository before you decide which one you are paying for at the end of the month.

Affiliate disclosure: AI vs Tool is reader-supported. Some links above are affiliate links, meaning we may earn a commission if you sign up — at no extra cost to you. This never influences our testing or rankings. Read our full Affiliate Disclosure.

Explore More AI Tools

Still deciding? Check out these related comparisons and best-of guides.